Đồng Tâm

 Quên mật khẩu
 Đăng ký
Xem: 1136|Trả lời: 0

Mọi người giúp mình làm bài tập Luật: Sai lầm dân sự

[Lấy địa chỉ]

373

Bài viết

0

Bạn bè

1371

Điểm

Thành viên sáng giá

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Đăng lúc 5-6-2015 20:50:16 |Xem tất
Case 1: Life magazine was doing an investigation for their magazine on supposed “quack doctors” that were practicing medicine illegally.  The investigator would pretend to be a patient and then go into the alleged doctors office undercover  with audio and camera equipment hidden.  This would record evidence that showed the doctors were in fact not licensed  physicians  and then they would  write about it. Dietemann  was one of these doctors that practiced medicine in the den of his home.  An undercover patient went into his home and was hooked up with audio that was being transmitted to a police car outside the home.  This foiled his operation and he was ousted as a fraud. He sued Life magazine saying that the hidden electronics were an invasion of his privacy.

Case 2: Plaintiffs were owners of a ship called the Tarleton. Plaintiff fitted the ship with hopes of trading with the natives on the Cameroon coast. The captain of the Tarleton sent a smaller vessel called the Bannister loaded with goods to another part of the coast to trade  with  natives.  Natives  began  to  visit  the  Bannister  when  Defendant’s  ship,  the Othello, shot on them with a cannon, killing one of them. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant did this so that the natives would not trade with Plaintiff. Plaintiff called the commander of the Bannister to testify at trial and the facts as stated were so proved. Is a cause of action permissible for interference with prospective economic advantage?

Case  3: Super  Corporation  discovered  that there  are some  articles  posted  on  internet warning that its products containing some dangerous substances. It requests the governmental agency to inspect the origin of the articles. As a result, the owner of the articles  is  Frank  Corporation,  a  competitor  of  Super  Corporation.  Please  give  your opinion on Frank Corporation’s action?

Case 4: Laura comes to T-cafe for a cup of coffee. The cafe serves her a very hot cup of coffee. It is so hot that she drops a cup and the coffee is spilled over her thighs make her third degree burns. She sues T-café for negligence. Does she win? Why?

Case 5: Carrie, a babysitter, had been taking care of Jill, a three-year old boy for months. One day, while playing with the boy, a phone rang, she left Jill alone to get the phone in
the kitchen. The telephone talk took five minutes. After that Carrie came back to the boy. Unfortunately,  the boy had fallen down to the floor during Carrie had a phone.  That caused the serious injury to his arms. Is Carrie liable for Jill’s injury?

Case 6: Phoebe buys a curling iron. While she is using the iron, it overheats, her hair catches fire, and she is burned? Is the curling iron manufacturer  liable for her injury? Why?

Case 7: On July 23, 2000, Delinda Middleton (now, Delinda Middleton Taylor) went to a Mariners game at Safeco Field with her then-boyfriend,  Glen Taylor, and her minor sons, Gavin and Jordan.    Their seats were in section 114, along  the right field foul line and four rows up from the field.    They arrived more than an hour before the game began to see the players warm up and to get their autographs.    As they walked to their seats, Taylor saw that players were practicing nearby.     Mariners pitcher Freddy Garcia was standing in front of section 114 on or about the right field line facing center field.    He was throwing a ball back and forth with José Mesa, who stood in right center field approximately 120 feet away.    As Taylor stood in front of her seat, she looked away from the field and a ball thrown by Mesa got past Garcia and struck Taylor in the face, causing serious injuries. Taylor sued the Seattle Mariners, José Mesa, Mirla Mesa, and Freddy Garcia, asserting that they were liable for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw.

Case 8: Plaintiff owned and operated a mine adjacent  to which Defendant  constructed  an artificial  pond.  The  latter  caused  a  mineshaft  collapse,  which  resulted  in  a  flood,  and damaged Plaintiff’s operation. The plaintiff sued, the matter was brought before an arbitrator to  independently  establish  facts.  The  trial  court  found  for  Plaintiff;  the  appellate  court affirmed; Defendant appealed to the House of Lords.
Mang danh tài sắc cho nên nợ,
Quen thói phong lưu hóa phải vay.
Quân tử lúc cùng thêm thẹn mặt,
Anh hùng khi gắp cũng khoanh tay.
Còn trời, còn đất, còn non nước
Có lẽ ta đâu mãi thế này
Trả lời

Dùng đạo cụ Báo cáo

Bạn phải đăng nhập mới được đăng bài Đăng nhập | Đăng ký



Lưu trữ|Mobile|học kế toán trưởng|biareview|dự án vinhomes gardenia|chung cư vinhomes metropolis|phương pháp khởi nghiệp tinh gọn|chiến lược hoạch định marketing|xây dựng phát triển thương hiệu|văn hóa phồn thực phương đông|chân lý triết học phương tây|tâm lý học hành vi cá nhân|phạm trù nguyên lý siêu hình học|hệ thống tín ngưỡng hầu đồng|quản trị kinh doanh như thế nào|bài học làm giàu thành công|kỹ năng công tác truyền thông|tư tưởng chính trị khổng tử|nhập môn kinh tế học tân cổ điển|chủ nghĩa tự do hiện đại|tổ chức tôn giáo hiện sinh|mô hình ý tưởng startup|sách hay luân lý nho giáo|quan điểm nghệ thuật cải lương|triết lý phật học cơ bản|kiến thức phân tích tài chính|sơ đồ quy trình SIPOC|khái niệm so sánh benchmarking là gì|giáo trình định nghĩa logic học|lý thuyết tư duy phê phán|lập kế hoạch quảng cáo hiệu quả|lịch sử trường phái Marxist|câu chuyện doanh nhân thành đạt|lý luận lãnh đạo cấp độ|thiết kế ma trận yếu tố nội bộ|tổng quan nguyên tắc giao tiếp|học thuyết nghiên cứu âm dương ngũ hành|tuyên ngôn phong trào dân chủ|định luật thông điệp pr|đăng ký công ty đại chúng|mở bán vinhomes trần duy hưng|vinhomes green bay|bảng giá vinhomes skylake|vinhomes riverside|vinhomes central park|vinhomes ocean park|bảo hiểm ô tô|du doan xo so|Đồng Tâm Info. + Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm về nội dung do thành viên đăng tải . + Truy cập website này nghĩa là bạn đã chấp nhận Quy định của Diễn đàn! + Mọi vấn đề xin liên hệ email: dinhhhsb00961@gmail.com Contact to Administrator : Hà Hải Định (01629201076;) DMCA.com Protection Status

GMT+7, 17-2-2019 23:56 , Processed in 0.013865 second(s), 21 queries .


Powered by X2.5

Lên trên